<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 52 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4171</link>
    <description>The court interpreted provisions of the Income-tax Act regarding setting aside assessment orders, the time limit for fresh assessments, and the validity of assessment orders based on appellate directions. It concluded that the assessment order was effectively set aside due to directions for additional evidence, applying relevant sections. The court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial legal question, after analyzing the Act&#039;s provisions and the specific circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 52 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4171</link>
      <description>The court interpreted provisions of the Income-tax Act regarding setting aside assessment orders, the time limit for fresh assessments, and the validity of assessment orders based on appellate directions. It concluded that the assessment order was effectively set aside due to directions for additional evidence, applying relevant sections. The court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial legal question, after analyzing the Act&#039;s provisions and the specific circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>