<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 667 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330069</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the trading addition, considering the justifications provided by the assessee and the verifiable reasons for the decline in GP rate. The application of case laws and the assessment of discrepancies in the books of accounts played a crucial role in the final judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:36:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 667 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330069</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the trading addition, considering the justifications provided by the assessee and the verifiable reasons for the decline in GP rate. The application of case laws and the assessment of discrepancies in the books of accounts played a crucial role in the final judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>