<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 662 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330064</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was deemed unjustified as the unexplained capital contributions were made before the firm commenced its business, leading to the penalty being canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:36:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 662 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330064</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was deemed unjustified as the unexplained capital contributions were made before the firm commenced its business, leading to the penalty being canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>