<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 914 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184681</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and confirming the deletion of additions made by the AO under Section 69C for unexplained expenditure, subcontract charges, and voluntary disclosure. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence and further investigation rather than assessments based on suspicion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 914 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184681</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and confirming the deletion of additions made by the AO under Section 69C for unexplained expenditure, subcontract charges, and voluntary disclosure. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence and further investigation rather than assessments based on suspicion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>