<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 125 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4167</link>
    <description>Input credit on master cartons used for repacking at depots depended on whether the depot was treated as a place of removal. Before 13-5-2003, when clearance was from the factory gate, cartons used after clearance at depots were not regarded as used in or in relation to manufacture, so credit was unavailable. After 13-5-2003, once the depot became the place of removal and goods were first sold there, additional packing at the depot formed part of the manufacturing chain, so credit was admissible. The limitation plea, though raised, required fresh examination of disclosure, departmental knowledge, and intent to evade duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 125 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4167</link>
      <description>Input credit on master cartons used for repacking at depots depended on whether the depot was treated as a place of removal. Before 13-5-2003, when clearance was from the factory gate, cartons used after clearance at depots were not regarded as used in or in relation to manufacture, so credit was unavailable. After 13-5-2003, once the depot became the place of removal and goods were first sold there, additional packing at the depot formed part of the manufacturing chain, so credit was admissible. The limitation plea, though raised, required fresh examination of disclosure, departmental knowledge, and intent to evade duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>