https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330046 The appellate tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision not to confiscate goods due to a shortage in weight for export, citing lack of evidence of illegal intent by the exporting party. Penalties were imposed on certain entities involved, but not on the exporting party, which demonstrated lack of malicious intent by applying for DEPB credit only for the actual quantity exported. Despite negligence in handling the cargo, the exporters' actions were deemed unintentional, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330046 The appellate tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision not to confiscate goods due to a shortage in weight for export, citing lack of evidence of illegal intent by the exporting party. Penalties were imposed on certain entities involved, but not on the exporting party, which demonstrated lack of malicious intent by applying for DEPB credit only for the actual quantity exported. Despite negligence in handling the cargo, the exporters' actions were deemed unintentional, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330046