<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 124 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting remission for 15,651 qtls of molasses that couldn&#039;t fit in the tanks due to temperature damage. However, remission was denied for the remaining quantity stored in the steel tank, with a directive for reassessment of liability. The decision was based on acknowledging the damage caused by temperature rise while highlighting discrepancies in storage utilization by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 124 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting remission for 15,651 qtls of molasses that couldn&#039;t fit in the tanks due to temperature damage. However, remission was denied for the remaining quantity stored in the steel tank, with a directive for reassessment of liability. The decision was based on acknowledging the damage caused by temperature rise while highlighting discrepancies in storage utilization by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>