<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 785 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184678</link>
    <description>Unquoted equity shares were held to require valuation under Rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules because a statutory rule prescribing the mode of valuation binds the authorities under the Act. The Tribunal&#039;s view that Rule 1D applied only to companies in liquidation or winding up, and that going concerns could be valued on a yield basis, was rejected. The Court also upheld the Commissioner&#039;s revisional power under section 25(2) on the valuation issue, and the question was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:35:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 785 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184678</link>
      <description>Unquoted equity shares were held to require valuation under Rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules because a statutory rule prescribing the mode of valuation binds the authorities under the Act. The Tribunal&#039;s view that Rule 1D applied only to companies in liquidation or winding up, and that going concerns could be valued on a yield basis, was rejected. The Court also upheld the Commissioner&#039;s revisional power under section 25(2) on the valuation issue, and the question was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>