<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 637 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330039</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to invoke Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the reasonable cause shown by the respondent. The penalty under Section 77 was deemed unsustainable, and the Tribunal supported the invocation of Section 80, ultimately disposing of the appeal in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 23:30:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 637 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330039</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to invoke Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the reasonable cause shown by the respondent. The penalty under Section 77 was deemed unsustainable, and the Tribunal supported the invocation of Section 80, ultimately disposing of the appeal in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>