https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330032 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant regarding the eligibility to avail Cenvat Credit on service tax paid by various service providers. The Tribunal found that the appellant's units were under the same entity, manufacturing excisable goods, and that there was no statutory requirement for proportionate distribution of service tax credit during the relevant period. The decision was supported by precedents such as Greaves Cotton Ltd. and Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. en-us Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330032 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant regarding the eligibility to avail Cenvat Credit on service tax paid by various service providers. The Tribunal found that the appellant's units were under the same entity, manufacturing excisable goods, and that there was no statutory requirement for proportionate distribution of service tax credit during the relevant period. The decision was supported by precedents such as Greaves Cotton Ltd. and Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330032