<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 218 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4163</link>
    <description>Central excise duty on goods produced under a genuine job-work arrangement rests with the supplier of raw materials or principal manufacturer, where the job worker processes supplied inputs and returns or clears the goods on the supplier&#039;s directions. Describing the arrangement as principal-to-principal does not by itself shift liability to the job worker. Job-work exemption conditions require compliance by the input supplier; where exemption is unavailable, duty remains the supplier&#039;s obligation. The extended limitation period cannot apply where periodic declarations, small-scale exemption claims and audits disclosed the activity, absent suppression of facts with intent to evade duty. Consequently, related interest and penalties cannot survive when the underlying duty demand fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 218 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4163</link>
      <description>Central excise duty on goods produced under a genuine job-work arrangement rests with the supplier of raw materials or principal manufacturer, where the job worker processes supplied inputs and returns or clears the goods on the supplier&#039;s directions. Describing the arrangement as principal-to-principal does not by itself shift liability to the job worker. Job-work exemption conditions require compliance by the input supplier; where exemption is unavailable, duty remains the supplier&#039;s obligation. The extended limitation period cannot apply where periodic declarations, small-scale exemption claims and audits disclosed the activity, absent suppression of facts with intent to evade duty. Consequently, related interest and penalties cannot survive when the underlying duty demand fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>