<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (1) TMI 50 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184667</link>
    <description>At the pre-process stage under Section 202 CrPC, a person named as accused has no right to participate as of right in the enquiry; the Magistrate may not permit intervention by questioning or examining witnesses at the accused&#039;s instance. The Magistrate&#039;s role is confined to deciding whether there is sufficient ground for proceeding on the complainant&#039;s material and other lawful material gathered in the enquiry, not whether conviction is likely or guilt can be assessed. A dismissal under Section 203 must briefly record reasons, as the omission prejudices revisionary challenge and is impermissible in the stated circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 18:10:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (1) TMI 50 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184667</link>
      <description>At the pre-process stage under Section 202 CrPC, a person named as accused has no right to participate as of right in the enquiry; the Magistrate may not permit intervention by questioning or examining witnesses at the accused&#039;s instance. The Magistrate&#039;s role is confined to deciding whether there is sufficient ground for proceeding on the complainant&#039;s material and other lawful material gathered in the enquiry, not whether conviction is likely or guilt can be assessed. A dismissal under Section 203 must briefly record reasons, as the omission prejudices revisionary challenge and is impermissible in the stated circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>