<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 729 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184661</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on L.P.G., L.D.O. and other inputs used by a job worker in manufacturing automotive gears was treated as allowable where the goods were processed as intermediate products for return under the job-work scheme. The note explains that Rule 57C does not apply merely because the processed goods are cleared under Rule 57F(4) or Notification No. 214/86-CE; it applies only where the assessee clears its own exempt final product. Earlier Tribunal reasoning was followed to confirm that credit should not be denied mechanically in a common manufacturing process involving both own production and job work, and the denial of credit was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:59:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 729 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184661</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on L.P.G., L.D.O. and other inputs used by a job worker in manufacturing automotive gears was treated as allowable where the goods were processed as intermediate products for return under the job-work scheme. The note explains that Rule 57C does not apply merely because the processed goods are cleared under Rule 57F(4) or Notification No. 214/86-CE; it applies only where the assessee clears its own exempt final product. Earlier Tribunal reasoning was followed to confirm that credit should not be denied mechanically in a common manufacturing process involving both own production and job work, and the denial of credit was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>