<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 125 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4158</link>
    <description>Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was held inapplicable where a common input was used in repeated manufacture cycles for a dutiable main product and an exempted by-product, and the assessee could not realistically maintain separate accounts because exact input consumption could not be segregated. The provision requiring payment of a percentage of the value of exempted goods was treated as operating only where separate accounts were practicable but not maintained. As the assessee had also reversed the credit taken, the demand was found unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 125 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4158</link>
      <description>Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was held inapplicable where a common input was used in repeated manufacture cycles for a dutiable main product and an exempted by-product, and the assessee could not realistically maintain separate accounts because exact input consumption could not be segregated. The provision requiring payment of a percentage of the value of exempted goods was treated as operating only where separate accounts were practicable but not maintained. As the assessee had also reversed the credit taken, the demand was found unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>