<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 618 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330020</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the additions made by the AO. The penalties were canceled due to discrepancies in revenue receipts, lack of proper consideration of Balance Sheets, and the absence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal emphasized that penalty proceedings are distinct from assessments and lack of explanation during penalty proceedings does not automatically warrant penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:54:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 618 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330020</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the additions made by the AO. The penalties were canceled due to discrepancies in revenue receipts, lack of proper consideration of Balance Sheets, and the absence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal emphasized that penalty proceedings are distinct from assessments and lack of explanation during penalty proceedings does not automatically warrant penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>