<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 642 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184643</link>
    <description>Central excise dispute in Commissioner v. CAMPCO reached the Supreme Court, which dismissed the appeal. The record does not set out any further reasoning or legal principle, so only the dismissal and the central excise context can be stated from the supplied text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 18:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 642 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184643</link>
      <description>Central excise dispute in Commissioner v. CAMPCO reached the Supreme Court, which dismissed the appeal. The record does not set out any further reasoning or legal principle, so only the dismissal and the central excise context can be stated from the supplied text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>