<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 669 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184637</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal and the cross objection of the assessee. The reimbursement of expenditure against the supply of material was held taxable, while customs duty was excluded from taxation under section 44BB. The interest received on income-tax refunds was directed to be taxed at 15% under the DTAA between India and USA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 18:12:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 669 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184637</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal and the cross objection of the assessee. The reimbursement of expenditure against the supply of material was held taxable, while customs duty was excluded from taxation under section 44BB. The interest received on income-tax refunds was directed to be taxed at 15% under the DTAA between India and USA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>