<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (4) TMI 19 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184633</link>
    <description>Application of the dividend-adjustment provision to property-owning companies assessed on notional income is limited where actual distributable profits constrain payment. The article explains that assessable income may exceed actual profits for companies assessed under the property-head; dividends are payable only from actual profits and distribution from capital is prohibited. The adjustment provision triggers if declared dividends are under the statutory proportion of assessable income unless tax authorities accept prior losses or small actual profits as reasonable cause. On the presented facts, no larger lawful dividend was supportable, so the provision was not properly invoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:40:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (4) TMI 19 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184633</link>
      <description>Application of the dividend-adjustment provision to property-owning companies assessed on notional income is limited where actual distributable profits constrain payment. The article explains that assessable income may exceed actual profits for companies assessed under the property-head; dividends are payable only from actual profits and distribution from capital is prohibited. The adjustment provision triggers if declared dividends are under the statutory proportion of assessable income unless tax authorities accept prior losses or small actual profits as reasonable cause. On the presented facts, no larger lawful dividend was supportable, so the provision was not properly invoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>