https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184627 Section 401 CrPC confers a supervisory revisional power, not an appellate power, so the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or interfere with an acquittal merely because another view is possible. Interference is confined to exceptional cases showing manifest illegality, procedural irregularity, or gross miscarriage of justice. A direction setting aside an acquittal and remanding the matter for a fresh judgment, especially after detailed comments on the merits, was treated as beyond the proper limits of revision because it could unfairly prejudice the accused. The Supreme Court therefore restored the trial court's acquittal and held that the revisional order could not stand. en-us Thu, 09 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184627 Section 401 CrPC confers a supervisory revisional power, not an appellate power, so the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or interfere with an acquittal merely because another view is possible. Interference is confined to exceptional cases showing manifest illegality, procedural irregularity, or gross miscarriage of justice. A direction setting aside an acquittal and remanding the matter for a fresh judgment, especially after detailed comments on the merits, was treated as beyond the proper limits of revision because it could unfairly prejudice the accused. The Supreme Court therefore restored the trial court's acquittal and held that the revisional order could not stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184627