https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184626 A Sessions Judge appointed as the judicial authority under section 6C of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 was treated as a pre-existing judicial officer acting as a court, not a persona designata, so the order was amenable to revision under sections 435 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. Revisional interference with an order setting aside confiscation of seized food grains was confined to exceptional cases of manifest illegality or gross miscarriage of justice. Because the Sessions Judge had considered the relevant circumstances and exercised discretionary appellate power, the High Court had no proper basis to upset that order in revision. en-us Fri, 14 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:10:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184626 A Sessions Judge appointed as the judicial authority under section 6C of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 was treated as a pre-existing judicial officer acting as a court, not a persona designata, so the order was amenable to revision under sections 435 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. Revisional interference with an order setting aside confiscation of seized food grains was confined to exceptional cases of manifest illegality or gross miscarriage of justice. Because the Sessions Judge had considered the relevant circumstances and exercised discretionary appellate power, the High Court had no proper basis to upset that order in revision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184626