https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4152 Service of an adjudication order complied with the statutory mode when it was sent by registered post and, after that failed, affixed on the Customs House notice board. On the admitted facts, the applicants could not show sufficient cause for a delay of about ten years in filing the appeals, and a bare plea of non-service did not justify condonation. Precedents relied on were found inapplicable because they involved materially different facts, including disputes about the date of service. The Tribunal rejected condonation of delay and refused to entertain the appeals as barred by limitation. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4152 Service of an adjudication order complied with the statutory mode when it was sent by registered post and, after that failed, affixed on the Customs House notice board. On the admitted facts, the applicants could not show sufficient cause for a delay of about ten years in filing the appeals, and a bare plea of non-service did not justify condonation. Precedents relied on were found inapplicable because they involved materially different facts, including disputes about the date of service. The Tribunal rejected condonation of delay and refused to entertain the appeals as barred by limitation. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4152