<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 903 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184619</link>
    <description>Where earlier Tribunal decisions on the same issue had attained finality because the Revenue did not appeal them, the Revenue was precluded from taking a contrary position in later proceedings. The Court applied the principle that an identical question, once finally decided and left unchallenged, binds the Revenue in subsequent cases. On that basis, the contrary stand in the present appeals was not permitted and the appeals were liable to be dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:05:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 903 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184619</link>
      <description>Where earlier Tribunal decisions on the same issue had attained finality because the Revenue did not appeal them, the Revenue was precluded from taking a contrary position in later proceedings. The Court applied the principle that an identical question, once finally decided and left unchallenged, binds the Revenue in subsequent cases. On that basis, the contrary stand in the present appeals was not permitted and the appeals were liable to be dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>