https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4149 Under Article 226(2), territorial jurisdiction is conferred where the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises. An impugned order passed by a tribunal at Chennai created part of the cause of action there, so the Madras High Court's Principal Seat at Chennai had jurisdiction despite the appellant being situated in Pudukottai and the Madurai Bench arrangement. The contrary view was held unsustainable, and the writ petition was directed to be numbered and placed before the learned single Judge for admission. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4149 Under Article 226(2), territorial jurisdiction is conferred where the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises. An impugned order passed by a tribunal at Chennai created part of the cause of action there, so the Madras High Court's Principal Seat at Chennai had jurisdiction despite the appellant being situated in Pudukottai and the Madurai Bench arrangement. The contrary view was held unsustainable, and the writ petition was directed to be numbered and placed before the learned single Judge for admission. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4149