https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329998 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for duty based on the brand name inscription on insulation bricks. It held that the inscription was for customer identification and did not affect small scale exemption eligibility. The Tribunal also found that the demand was invalid due to the expiration of the limitation period, emphasizing the lack of mala fide intentions on the appellant's part. The decision provided relief to the appellant in line with legal interpretations and precedents during the relevant period. en-us Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329998 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for duty based on the brand name inscription on insulation bricks. It held that the inscription was for customer identification and did not affect small scale exemption eligibility. The Tribunal also found that the demand was invalid due to the expiration of the limitation period, emphasizing the lack of mala fide intentions on the appellant's part. The decision provided relief to the appellant in line with legal interpretations and precedents during the relevant period. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329998