https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329997 The appellate authority set aside the impugned order denying cenvat credit to the appellant due to a description error in the invoice, which was rectified by a certificate from the supplier's Range Superintendent confirming the supply of correct goods. The judgment underscores the necessity of precise goods description in invoices for claiming cenvat credit and the pivotal role of documentary evidence, including official certifications, in resolving discrepancies. It emphasizes the obligation of authorities to carefully evaluate all evidence presented by the appellant to guarantee equitable treatment in similar situations. en-us Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jul 2016 12:45:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329997 The appellate authority set aside the impugned order denying cenvat credit to the appellant due to a description error in the invoice, which was rectified by a certificate from the supplier's Range Superintendent confirming the supply of correct goods. The judgment underscores the necessity of precise goods description in invoices for claiming cenvat credit and the pivotal role of documentary evidence, including official certifications, in resolving discrepancies. It emphasizes the obligation of authorities to carefully evaluate all evidence presented by the appellant to guarantee equitable treatment in similar situations. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329997