<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 592 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329994</link>
    <description>The Appellant&#039;s Appeal was allowed to the extent indicated, with the case being remanded for further verification and calculation of the penalty amount based on the revised demand. The Appellant was directed to produce relevant documents for examination, and the Adjudicating Authority was instructed to rework the penalty amount, giving the Appellant the option to pay 25% of the reduced penalty on the redetermined amount within one month from the receipt of the final order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 592 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329994</link>
      <description>The Appellant&#039;s Appeal was allowed to the extent indicated, with the case being remanded for further verification and calculation of the penalty amount based on the revised demand. The Appellant was directed to produce relevant documents for examination, and the Adjudicating Authority was instructed to rework the penalty amount, giving the Appellant the option to pay 25% of the reduced penalty on the redetermined amount within one month from the receipt of the final order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>