https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329991 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, quashing the attachment notice and directing recovery proceedings against the company rather than the Directors personally. It emphasized that recovery could only be pursued against the company as the defaulter, not the individual Directors. The court differentiated the case from a cited precedent, highlighting the legal provisions governing liability for government dues under the Customs Act. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329991 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, quashing the attachment notice and directing recovery proceedings against the company rather than the Directors personally. It emphasized that recovery could only be pursued against the company as the defaulter, not the individual Directors. The court differentiated the case from a cited precedent, highlighting the legal provisions governing liability for government dues under the Customs Act. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329991