https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329984 Institution of a suit by a public sector undertaking was not barred merely because prior Committee on Disputes clearance had not been obtained, since the earlier directions only suspended further progress in the proceedings and did not make the filing itself illegal; the plaint therefore could not be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. The dispute was also held fit for fresh adjudication in law because the earlier non-statutory administrative mechanism did not finally and effectually resolve the parties' claims and counterclaims. The SC accordingly set aside rejection of the plaint and directed reference of the dispute to a sole arbitrator. en-us Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Oct 2016 14:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329984 Institution of a suit by a public sector undertaking was not barred merely because prior Committee on Disputes clearance had not been obtained, since the earlier directions only suspended further progress in the proceedings and did not make the filing itself illegal; the plaint therefore could not be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. The dispute was also held fit for fresh adjudication in law because the earlier non-statutory administrative mechanism did not finally and effectually resolve the parties' claims and counterclaims. The SC accordingly set aside rejection of the plaint and directed reference of the dispute to a sole arbitrator. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329984