<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 216 - HIGH COURT GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4145</link>
    <description>Rebate on excisable materials used in export manufacture was held to require strict compliance with the prescribed procedure under Notification No. 41/2001-C.E. (N.T.) issued under Rule 18 of the Central Excise (No. 2) Rules, 2001. The claim failed because the petitioners did not follow that procedure and had already availed DEPB benefit for the same exports. The governing rule against double relief prevented reimbursement of the same duty incidence twice, so simultaneous DEPB credit and rebate was not permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 216 - HIGH COURT GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4145</link>
      <description>Rebate on excisable materials used in export manufacture was held to require strict compliance with the prescribed procedure under Notification No. 41/2001-C.E. (N.T.) issued under Rule 18 of the Central Excise (No. 2) Rules, 2001. The claim failed because the petitioners did not follow that procedure and had already availed DEPB benefit for the same exports. The governing rule against double relief prevented reimbursement of the same duty incidence twice, so simultaneous DEPB credit and rebate was not permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>