<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 567 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329969</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2008-09, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order that deleted the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for professional fees paid outside India without deduction of tax at source. The Tribunal found that the payments made to non-resident entities for professional services were not chargeable to tax in India under the relevant Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements, leading to the deletion of the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:41:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 567 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329969</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2008-09, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order that deleted the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for professional fees paid outside India without deduction of tax at source. The Tribunal found that the payments made to non-resident entities for professional services were not chargeable to tax in India under the relevant Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements, leading to the deletion of the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>