<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (2) TMI 115 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184607</link>
    <description>Profit from the sale of silver bars was treated as taxable income because the transaction, on its surrounding circumstances, was a commercial adventure in the nature of trade. The decisive inquiry was the character of the purchase at the time it was made, assessed from the cumulative effect of all relevant facts. Substantial purchases in instalments, made when prices were expected to rise and retained for sale at a suitable opportunity, indicated an intention to resell at a profit. The fact that the deal was outside the assessee&#039;s regular line of business did not negate trading character, and the explanations of investment or compelled sale were not accepted on the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:59:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (2) TMI 115 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184607</link>
      <description>Profit from the sale of silver bars was treated as taxable income because the transaction, on its surrounding circumstances, was a commercial adventure in the nature of trade. The decisive inquiry was the character of the purchase at the time it was made, assessed from the cumulative effect of all relevant facts. Substantial purchases in instalments, made when prices were expected to rise and retained for sale at a suitable opportunity, indicated an intention to resell at a profit. The fact that the deal was outside the assessee&#039;s regular line of business did not negate trading character, and the explanations of investment or compelled sale were not accepted on the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>