https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184604 A rival rice-milling trader had no locus standi to challenge permission for shifting the location of an existing rice mill, because the statutory scheme treated such shifting as a licensing condition for an existing unit and commercial harm from increased competition did not create an enforceable legal right. The authority granting permission under section 8(3)(c) was also not bound to apply the considerations in section 5(4), since that provision governed permits for new or defunct mills and was not imported into the separate permission regime by implication. The order permitting the shift was therefore upheld. en-us Fri, 27 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:41:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184604 A rival rice-milling trader had no locus standi to challenge permission for shifting the location of an existing rice mill, because the statutory scheme treated such shifting as a licensing condition for an existing unit and commercial harm from increased competition did not create an enforceable legal right. The authority granting permission under section 8(3)(c) was also not bound to apply the considerations in section 5(4), since that provision governed permits for new or defunct mills and was not imported into the separate permission regime by implication. The order permitting the shift was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184604