https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184602 Order I Rule 10 CPC permits impleadment where a person's presence is necessary for complete adjudication and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. The text addresses purchasers of undivided shares who were alleged to have bought in breach of an injunction, raising questions on the vendor's binding obligation and whether the transferees were bona fide purchasers for value in good faith. Those issues had to be examined to determine whether their presence was required in the suit or impleadment proceedings. The purchasers were treated as proper and necessary parties, and the challenge to their impleadment was rejected. en-us Thu, 18 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:36:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184602 Order I Rule 10 CPC permits impleadment where a person's presence is necessary for complete adjudication and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. The text addresses purchasers of undivided shares who were alleged to have bought in breach of an injunction, raising questions on the vendor's binding obligation and whether the transferees were bona fide purchasers for value in good faith. Those issues had to be examined to determine whether their presence was required in the suit or impleadment proceedings. The purchasers were treated as proper and necessary parties, and the challenge to their impleadment was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184602