https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184599 The Supreme Court determined that the appellant was considered a confirmed employee since 10.01.1979, despite the lack of a formal certificate of completion of probation. The termination was found valid due to the appellant's confirmed status and the detailed report of inefficiencies leading to the decision. However, the termination was deemed invalid as the appellant was not given the opportunity to explain, violating natural justice principles. The appellant was awarded Rs. 2 lakhs in compensation due to the financial circumstances and lack of reinstatement possibility. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the termination order. en-us Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:01:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184599 The Supreme Court determined that the appellant was considered a confirmed employee since 10.01.1979, despite the lack of a formal certificate of completion of probation. The termination was found valid due to the appellant's confirmed status and the detailed report of inefficiencies leading to the decision. However, the termination was deemed invalid as the appellant was not given the opportunity to explain, violating natural justice principles. The appellant was awarded Rs. 2 lakhs in compensation due to the financial circumstances and lack of reinstatement possibility. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the termination order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184599