https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184597 The court held that the reduction in the retirement age to 55 years did not amount to removal of public servants under Art. 311 of the Constitution. The rule was found not to be retrospective and did not violate Art. 14 as it uniformly fixed December 31, 1961, as the retirement date for affected public servants. The appeal was dismissed with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 07 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:47:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184597 The court held that the reduction in the retirement age to 55 years did not amount to removal of public servants under Art. 311 of the Constitution. The rule was found not to be retrospective and did not violate Art. 14 as it uniformly fixed December 31, 1961, as the retirement date for affected public servants. The appeal was dismissed with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184597