https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329962 The court upheld the disqualification of the petitioner from the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 (VCES, 2013) due to non-compliance with deposit requirements. The withdrawal of immunity under Section 108(1) of the Finance Act, 2013 was affirmed as the petitioner failed to meet the payment deadline. The court rejected lenient interpretation arguments, emphasizing strict adherence to VCES, 2013 provisions. Allegations of discrimination were dismissed, and the court affirmed its limited jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the disqualification order and emphasizing compliance with VCES, 2013 provisions. en-us Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2016 18:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329962 The court upheld the disqualification of the petitioner from the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 (VCES, 2013) due to non-compliance with deposit requirements. The withdrawal of immunity under Section 108(1) of the Finance Act, 2013 was affirmed as the petitioner failed to meet the payment deadline. The court rejected lenient interpretation arguments, emphasizing strict adherence to VCES, 2013 provisions. Allegations of discrimination were dismissed, and the court affirmed its limited jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the disqualification order and emphasizing compliance with VCES, 2013 provisions. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329962