<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 557 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329959</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting the appellant Cenvat credit for input services at the Mumbai office. It emphasized the importance of centralized registration, legal occupation, and centralized accounting practices in determining eligibility for credit. The adjudicating authority was directed to grant the balance refund amount within 60 days along with interest, except for specific disallowed amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 557 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329959</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting the appellant Cenvat credit for input services at the Mumbai office. It emphasized the importance of centralized registration, legal occupation, and centralized accounting practices in determining eligibility for credit. The adjudicating authority was directed to grant the balance refund amount within 60 days along with interest, except for specific disallowed amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>