https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184594 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the increased gratuity provision with prospective effect from a specified date does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The Court ruled that the revision should not apply retrospectively to pensioners who retired before the specified date, emphasizing the prospective nature of the scheme. The Court held that arrears need not be paid for gratuity benefits accrued under the revised scheme and rejected the argument that all retirees should receive the revised gratuity, stating that such revisions are prospective and not retrospective. en-us Fri, 25 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:31:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184594 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the increased gratuity provision with prospective effect from a specified date does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The Court ruled that the revision should not apply retrospectively to pensioners who retired before the specified date, emphasizing the prospective nature of the scheme. The Court held that arrears need not be paid for gratuity benefits accrued under the revised scheme and rejected the argument that all retirees should receive the revised gratuity, stating that such revisions are prospective and not retrospective. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184594