<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 553 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329955</link>
    <description>Extended limitation cannot be invoked for valuation disputes in job-work manufacturing where the assessee values goods on the disclosed basis of customer-supplied scrap cost plus processing charges. The assessee&#039;s invoices showed the conversion from customer-supplied scrap and the valuation method adopted, and the record did not establish that it knew of any under-valuation by the supplier or of higher comparable values from another job worker. In the absence of express or implied suppression or misdeclaration, the demand could not be sustained beyond the normal period, and the notice was time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 553 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329955</link>
      <description>Extended limitation cannot be invoked for valuation disputes in job-work manufacturing where the assessee values goods on the disclosed basis of customer-supplied scrap cost plus processing charges. The assessee&#039;s invoices showed the conversion from customer-supplied scrap and the valuation method adopted, and the record did not establish that it knew of any under-valuation by the supplier or of higher comparable values from another job worker. In the absence of express or implied suppression or misdeclaration, the demand could not be sustained beyond the normal period, and the notice was time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>