https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329952 The appellant's appeal regarding penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for issuing invoices for CENVAT credit was partially successful. Despite the main noticee settling the matter, the appellant, as a co-noticee, was held liable but had the penalty reduced from Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 50,000. The judgment stressed the importance of compliance with excise rules, even in cases of unintentional errors, emphasizing the necessity of accurate documentation and adherence to regulatory standards. en-us Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329952 The appellant's appeal regarding penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for issuing invoices for CENVAT credit was partially successful. Despite the main noticee settling the matter, the appellant, as a co-noticee, was held liable but had the penalty reduced from Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 50,000. The judgment stressed the importance of compliance with excise rules, even in cases of unintentional errors, emphasizing the necessity of accurate documentation and adherence to regulatory standards. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329952