https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184592 The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision in a case concerning a discrepancy in an employee's date of birth. The Court ruled in favor of the State's recorded date of birth, 1.9.1930, rejecting the employee's claim of 1.9.1939 due to lack of evidence. The employee was entitled to retiral benefits only up to the actual date of superannuation, 30.9.1990, not beyond that to the erroneous date claimed. The judgment stressed the importance of accurate service records, timely corrections, and conclusive evidence to prevent disputes, especially near retirement, and highlighted the impact of delayed claims on promotion prospects and fairness in such cases. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:16:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184592 The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision in a case concerning a discrepancy in an employee's date of birth. The Court ruled in favor of the State's recorded date of birth, 1.9.1930, rejecting the employee's claim of 1.9.1939 due to lack of evidence. The employee was entitled to retiral benefits only up to the actual date of superannuation, 30.9.1990, not beyond that to the erroneous date claimed. The judgment stressed the importance of accurate service records, timely corrections, and conclusive evidence to prevent disputes, especially near retirement, and highlighted the impact of delayed claims on promotion prospects and fairness in such cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184592