<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 123 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4137</link>
    <description>Education Cess under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 2004 is leviable only on excisable goods, so it cannot be demanded where the common input relates to non-excisable goods such as rectified spirit. The 8% amount reversed under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules was held not to attract Education Cess because the underlying product was outside Central Excise duty. On that basis, the cess demand on the reversal amount was rejected and the assessee&#039;s position was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 123 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4137</link>
      <description>Education Cess under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 2004 is leviable only on excisable goods, so it cannot be demanded where the common input relates to non-excisable goods such as rectified spirit. The 8% amount reversed under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules was held not to attract Education Cess because the underlying product was outside Central Excise duty. On that basis, the cess demand on the reversal amount was rejected and the assessee&#039;s position was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>