https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184585 Agrarian reform amendments to section 44 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act were upheld as consistent with the Directive Principles in Articles 39(b) and 39(c), and their inclusion in the Ninth Schedule did not by itself offend the basic structure. The statutory creation of Land Tribunals was also sustained, as the absence of formal legal qualifications for members did not invalidate the legislative choice for deciding the specified land questions. However, the prohibition on legal practitioners appearing before the Tribunals was held repugnant to the Advocates Act, so that restriction could not be enforced against advocates. en-us Thu, 23 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:18:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184585 Agrarian reform amendments to section 44 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act were upheld as consistent with the Directive Principles in Articles 39(b) and 39(c), and their inclusion in the Ninth Schedule did not by itself offend the basic structure. The statutory creation of Land Tribunals was also sustained, as the absence of formal legal qualifications for members did not invalidate the legislative choice for deciding the specified land questions. However, the prohibition on legal practitioners appearing before the Tribunals was held repugnant to the Advocates Act, so that restriction could not be enforced against advocates. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184585