https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329943 In an NDPS prosecution, non-production of the seized contraband and sample before the trial court did not by itself invalidate the case where the court found other reliable evidence linking the forensic report to the recovered substance. The court also treated the accused's Section 67 statement as admissible and trustworthy because it was not shown to have been obtained by coercion and was supported by official witnesses and independent witnesses. Read with the surrounding search, seizure, and recovery evidence, the confession was sufficient to sustain the conviction beyond reasonable doubt. en-us Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:02:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329943 In an NDPS prosecution, non-production of the seized contraband and sample before the trial court did not by itself invalidate the case where the court found other reliable evidence linking the forensic report to the recovered substance. The court also treated the accused's Section 67 statement as admissible and trustworthy because it was not shown to have been obtained by coercion and was supported by official witnesses and independent witnesses. Read with the surrounding search, seizure, and recovery evidence, the confession was sufficient to sustain the conviction beyond reasonable doubt. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329943