<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 534 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329936</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed both appeals filed by the revenue and the assessee. The CIT(A) decision to delete the addition of Rs. 15,00,000 under Section 68 was upheld due to the established source of credit. However, the addition of Rs. 5,00,000 was confirmed as unexplained cash credits, supported by the lack of satisfactory explanations from the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 534 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329936</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed both appeals filed by the revenue and the assessee. The CIT(A) decision to delete the addition of Rs. 15,00,000 under Section 68 was upheld due to the established source of credit. However, the addition of Rs. 5,00,000 was confirmed as unexplained cash credits, supported by the lack of satisfactory explanations from the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>