https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329924 The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals for A.Y. 2005-06 to 2008-09, upholding the CIT(A)'s orders. The reassessment orders were quashed as the reopening lacked a failure to disclose material facts, rendering it invalid. Additionally, the assessee's claim for deduction under section 10A was allowed as the basis for disallowance was found to be unsustainable. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on both technical grounds and the merits of the deduction claim. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:59:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329924 The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals for A.Y. 2005-06 to 2008-09, upholding the CIT(A)'s orders. The reassessment orders were quashed as the reopening lacked a failure to disclose material facts, rendering it invalid. Additionally, the assessee's claim for deduction under section 10A was allowed as the basis for disallowance was found to be unsustainable. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on both technical grounds and the merits of the deduction claim. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329924