https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184580 The Supreme Court held that a person who resigned from service before the implementation of a revised pay scale is not entitled to retrospective benefits. The Court emphasized that the implementation of pay revisions is a policy decision and not a legal right for individuals unless accepted by the employer or state. The appellant's resignation before the Office Memorandum's issuance and the absence of a directive from the Kerala State Government led to the dismissal of the appeal, with no costs awarded. en-us Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:47:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184580 The Supreme Court held that a person who resigned from service before the implementation of a revised pay scale is not entitled to retrospective benefits. The Court emphasized that the implementation of pay revisions is a policy decision and not a legal right for individuals unless accepted by the employer or state. The appellant's resignation before the Office Memorandum's issuance and the absence of a directive from the Kerala State Government led to the dismissal of the appeal, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184580