https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184578 Where service rules fix a maximum probation period and an employee continues in service beyond that limit without an express order of confirmation, deemed confirmation may arise from the expiry of the probationary ceiling, continued service, and related conduct such as grant of increments. Once confirmed by implication, termination of that tenure cannot be treated as a simple discharge; it operates as removal from service. As the employees were terminated without departmental enquiry, hearing, or compliance with the disciplinary rules, the orders attracted Article 311 safeguards and were invalid as punitive removals. en-us Fri, 02 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:22:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184578 Where service rules fix a maximum probation period and an employee continues in service beyond that limit without an express order of confirmation, deemed confirmation may arise from the expiry of the probationary ceiling, continued service, and related conduct such as grant of increments. Once confirmed by implication, termination of that tenure cannot be treated as a simple discharge; it operates as removal from service. As the employees were terminated without departmental enquiry, hearing, or compliance with the disciplinary rules, the orders attracted Article 311 safeguards and were invalid as punitive removals. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184578