https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184575 The appellant challenged his reversion from the post of Legal Assistant, alleging conspiracy and invoking legal protection under Article 311 for temporary government servants. The court found the reversion was due to poor performance, not punishment, emphasizing temporary appointments do not guarantee a position. Different views on reversion motives were discussed, advocating for a clearer legal framework. The court dismissed the appeal, stating reversion of temporary employees is valid unless mala fides are proven, stressing the importance of clear legal interpretations in cases involving government employee discharge or reversion. en-us Wed, 08 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:51:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184575 The appellant challenged his reversion from the post of Legal Assistant, alleging conspiracy and invoking legal protection under Article 311 for temporary government servants. The court found the reversion was due to poor performance, not punishment, emphasizing temporary appointments do not guarantee a position. Different views on reversion motives were discussed, advocating for a clearer legal framework. The court dismissed the appeal, stating reversion of temporary employees is valid unless mala fides are proven, stressing the importance of clear legal interpretations in cases involving government employee discharge or reversion. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184575