<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 861 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184560</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the civil appeals was condoned, and the Supreme Court then dismissed the appeals. The order records no further reasoning on the central excise dispute, so the only operative outcome available is that the appeals did not succeed after condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:46:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 861 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184560</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the civil appeals was condoned, and the Supreme Court then dismissed the appeals. The order records no further reasoning on the central excise dispute, so the only operative outcome available is that the appeals did not succeed after condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>